President Obama’s Fort Hood Speech — Full Text

We come together filled with sorrow for the thirteen Americans that we have lost; with gratitude for the lives that they led; and with a determination to honor them through the work we carry on.

This is a time of war. And yet these Americans did not die on a foreign field of battle. They were killed here, on American soil, in the heart of this great American community. It is this fact that makes the tragedy even more painful and even more incomprehensible.

For those families who have lost a loved one, no words can fill the void that has been left. We knew these men and women as soldiers and caregivers. You knew them as mothers and fathers; sons and daughters; sisters and brothers.

But here is what you must also know: your loved ones endure through the life of our nation. Their memory will be honored in the places they lived and by the people they touched. Their life’s work is our security, and the freedom that we too often take for granted. Every evening that the sun sets on a tranquil town; every dawn that a flag is unfurled; every moment that an American enjoys life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness – that is their legacy.

Neither this country – nor the values that we were founded upon – could exist without men and women like these thirteen Americans. And that is why we must pay tribute to their stories.

Chief Warrant Officer Michael Cahill had served in the National Guard and worked as a physician’s assistant for decades. A husband and father of three, he was so committed to his patients that on the day he died, he was back at work just weeks after having a heart attack.

Major Libardo Eduardo Caraveo spoke little English when he came to America as a teenager. But he put himself through college, earned a PhD, and was helping combat units cope with the stress of deployment. He is survived by his wife, sons and step-daughters.

Staff Sergeant Justin DeCrow joined the Army right after high school, married his high school sweetheart, and had served as a light wheeled mechanic and Satellite Communications Operator. He was known as an optimist, a mentor, and a loving husband and father.

After retiring from the Army as a Major, John Gaffaney cared for society’s most vulnerable during two decades as a psychiatric nurse. He spent three years trying to return to active duty in this time of war, and he was preparing to deploy to Iraq as a Captain. He leaves behind a wife and son.

Specialist Frederick Greene was a Tennessean who wanted to join the Army for a long time, and did so in 2008 with the support of his family. As a combat engineer he was a natural leader, and he is survived by his wife and two daughters.

Specialist Jason Hunt was also recently married, with three children to care for. He joined the Army after high school. He did a tour in Iraq, and it was there that he re-enlisted for six more years on his 21st birthday so that he could continue to serve.

Staff Sergeant Amy Krueger was an athlete in high school, joined the Army shortly after 9/11, and had since returned home to speak to students about her experience. When her mother told her she couldn’t take on Osama bin Laden by herself, Amy replied: “Watch me.”

Private First Class Aaron Nemelka was an Eagle Scout who just recently signed up to do one of the most dangerous jobs in the service – diffuse bombs – so that he could help save lives. He was proudly carrying on a tradition of military service that runs deep within his family.

Private First Class Michael Pearson loved his family and loved his music, and his goal was to be a music teacher. He excelled at playing the guitar, and could create songs on the spot and show others how to play. He joined the military a year ago, and was preparing for his first deployment.

Captain Russell Seager worked as a nurse for the VA, helping veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress. He had great respect for the military, and signed up to serve so that he could help soldiers cope with the stress of combat and return to civilian life. He leaves behind a wife and son.

Private Francheska Velez, the daughter of a father from Colombia and a Puerto Rican mother, had recently served in Korea and in Iraq, and was pursuing a career in the Army. When she was killed, she was pregnant with her first child, and was excited about becoming a mother.

Lieutenant Colonel Juanita Warman was the daughter and granddaughter of Army veterans. She was a single mother who put herself through college and graduate school, and served as a nurse practitioner while raising her two daughters. She also left behind a loving husband.

Private First Class Kham Xiong came to America from Thailand as a small child. He was a husband and father who followed his brother into the military because his family had a strong history of service. He was preparing for his first deployment to Afghanistan.

These men and women came from all parts of the country. Some had long careers in the military. Some had signed up to serve in the shadow of 9/11. Some had known intense combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, and some cared for those did. Their lives speak to the strength, the dignity and the decency of those who serve, and that is how they will be remembered.

That same spirit is embodied in the community here at Fort Hood, and in the many wounded who are still recovering. In those terrible minutes during the attack, soldiers made makeshift tourniquets out of their clothes. They braved gunfire to reach the wounded, and ferried them to safety in the backs of cars and a pick-up truck.

One young soldier, Amber Bahr, was so intent on helping others that she did not realize for some time that she, herself, had been shot in the back. Two police officers – Mark Todd and Kim Munley – saved countless lives by risking their own. One medic – Francisco de la Serna – treated both Officer Munley and the gunman who shot her.

It may be hard to comprehend the twisted logic that led to this tragedy. But this much we do know – no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor. And for what he has done, we know that the killer will be met with justice – in this world, and the next.

These are trying times for our country. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the same extremists who killed nearly 3,000 Americans continue to endanger America, our allies, and innocent Afghans and Pakistanis. In Iraq, we are working to bring a war to a successful end, as there are still those who would deny the Iraqi people the future that Americans and Iraqis have sacrificed so much for.

As we face these challenges, the stories of those at Fort Hood reaffirm the core values that we are fighting for, and the strength that we must draw upon. Theirs are tales of American men and women answering an extraordinary call – the call to serve their comrades, their communities, and their country. In an age of selfishness, they embody responsibility. In an era of division, they call upon us to come together. In a time of cynicism, they remind us of who we are as Americans.

We are a nation that endures because of the courage of those who defend it. We saw that valor in those who braved bullets here at Fort Hood, just as surely as we see it in those who signed up knowing that they would serve in harm’s way.

We are a nation of laws whose commitment to justice is so enduring that we would treat a gunman and give him due process, just as surely as we will see that he pays for his crimes.

We are a nation that guarantees the freedom to worship as one chooses. And instead of claiming God for our side, we remember Lincoln’s words, and always pray to be on the side of God.

We are a nation that is dedicated to the proposition that all men and women are created equal. We live that truth within our military, and see it in the varied backgrounds of those we lay to rest today. We defend that truth at home and abroad, and we know that Americans will always be found on the side of liberty and equality. That is who we are as a people.

Tomorrow is Veterans Day. It is a chance to pause, and to pay tribute – for students to learn of the struggles that preceded them; for families to honor the service of parents and grandparents; for citizens to reflect upon the sacrifices that have been made in pursuit of a more perfect union.

For history is filled with heroes. You may remember the stories of a grandfather who marched across Europe; an uncle who fought in Vietnam; a sister who served in the Gulf. But as we honor the many generations who have served, I think all of us – every single American – must acknowledge that this generation has more than proved itself the equal of those who have come before.

We need not look to the past for greatness, because it is before our very eyes.

This generation of soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen have volunteered in a time of certain danger. They are part of the finest fighting force that the world has ever known. They have served tour after tour of duty in distant, different and difficult places. They have stood watch in blinding deserts and on snowy mountains. They have extended the opportunity of self-government to peoples that have suffered tyranny and war. They are man and woman; white, black, and brown; of all faiths and stations – all Americans, serving together to protect our people, while giving others half a world away the chance to lead a better life.

In today’s wars, there is not always a simple ceremony that signals our troops’ success – no surrender papers to be signed, or capital to be claimed. But the measure of their impact is no less great – in a world of threats that no know borders, it will be marked in the safety of our cities and towns, and the security and opportunity that is extended abroad. And it will serve as testimony to the character of those who serve, and the example that you set for America and for the world.

Here, at Fort Hood, we pay tribute to thirteen men and women who were not able to escape the horror of war, even in the comfort of home. Later today, at Fort Lewis, one community will gather to remember so many in one Stryker Brigade who have fallen in Afghanistan.

Long after they are laid to rest – when the fighting has finished, and our nation has endured; when today’s servicemen and women are veterans, and their children have grown – it will be said of this generation that they believed under the most trying of tests; that they persevered not just when it was easy, but when it was hard; and that they paid the price and bore the burden to secure this nation, and stood up for the values that live in the hearts of all free peoples.

So we say goodbye to those who now belong to eternity. We press ahead in pursuit of the peace that guided their service. May God bless the memory of those we lost. And may God bless the United States of America.

The Stages of Impunity

The Stages of Impunity

I think it is worthwhile to do three things with the term impunity. Define it broadly. Circulate it widely until it becomes widely understood. And indicate that it is not a fixed state, but the product of several stages of development.

So here goes.

1. A Broad Definition of Impunity

Impunity means without punishment. It means getting away with something. The problem with this definition is that it is literal and it does not indicate what one gets away with. Therefore let me narrow the definition before I widen it. In specific terms, impunity refers to an act that is criminal and which can only be without punishment because the perpetrator has power to avoid punishment. (Ironically this suggests that some aspects of law are intimately involved with the creation of impunity.)

Many in the human rights arena do not like the term impunity because of overuse in statements and documents. The behavior of the regime in Sudan is often embellished with the word impunity. Anything to do with genocide is often paired with the word as well.

Here is my general notion of broadening the term and encouraging its wide acceptance. My goal is to raise consciousness.

Thus, for example, bullying is a form of action done with impunity. The bully assumes there will be no consequences beyond satisfaction in harming someone. So is domestic abuse. Rarely does domestic abuse of all forms, verbal as well as physical, incur a just response. A broad use of impunity would cover every harmful use of human power when there is no just consequence.

To define justice I will advance two standards. The first is a penalty fit to the abuse — equivalent to it. The second would be remedial action of some sort, designed to prevent more injurious acts.

2. Circulating the Term Impunity Until It Is Accepted As A Standard for Cruel and Abusive Behavior in Gemeral

There are several reasons for proposing the wide circulation of the term impunity.

a) It would underline the fact that all relationships involve the use of power. Even the casual use of “impunity” in a domestic setting might open eyes to the “debt” one incurs by various actions or inactions. Yes, inaction that is harmful counts.

b) It would help awaken the world to the incredible scope of injustice. Power of all sorts works to disadvantage multitudes. There is no recourse to law in many cases.

Simply take any instance of conflict in which people are moved about and made subservient to armed authority. The disturbance in East Timor comes to mind. And actions around Katrina.

All refugee situations involve impunity.

One could say a banker who knowingly bilks a customer incurs a debt due to impunity.

c) To raise the issue like this is to tempt the MSM into the fray. That would be a good thing. We are happy when the MSM comes closer to the hems of the Emperor’s clothes. Even when our propositions are made the object of wing nut scorn I have considerable trust in the great democracy of popular parsing. We are seeing some limits to wing nut power these days.

3. Impunity Has Clear Stages of Development

Impunity is a yielding to temptation. It is as simple as seeing an apple and plucking it from someone’s apple tree. This is not the sort of marauding that will bring out a Human Rights Watch reporter, but it inderlines that the first stage of impunity is opportunity.

As in a bureaucratic arrangement that opens doors to fraud. As in the knowledge that your body is more powerful than the body approaching you in a crowd. As in the use of one’s status of any sort to lord it over someone else.

Anytime we yield to the temptation to use what power we have to our advantage, with deleterious consequences to others, we move from opportunity to practice.

Beyond opportunity and practice, there is the social acceptance stage of impunity.

It is now socially acceptable in most places to do unto the homeless what we would never wish to have done to us. This is a social acceptance stage sort of thing. When referendums are used to impose legal restrictions on the fair use of people’s bodies, there is a similar effort to impose social acceptance of a disadvantage.

The ultimate stage of impunity is reached when there is no freedom or capacity left to oppose the decisions of the powerful. The ultimate opposition to impunity is a fair court of law or some other form of effective negotiation.

The best individual response is a nonreligious attention to the substance of the Lord’s Prayer, which is the need of human beings to adjudicate power relationships through the tangible power of forgiveness. Since the same prayer suggests that we do the will of the deity, one might assume that the prayer correctly indicates that forgiving actions are the only way to forgiveness. Or, stated differently, that the exercise of impunity invalidates any prior claim to grace.

Well, one does not propose such things in a vacuum. I shall throw this crumb onto the waters and see of it floats. I believe it should.

House Democrats Who Voted NO on Health Care Reform

The following Democratic members of the House voted NO on Health Care Reform. The complete list of all votes is here.

Jason Altmire D PA-4
John Adler D NJ-3
Rick Boucher D VA-9
Brian Baird D WA-3
John Barrow D GA-12
Dan Boren D OK-2
John Boccieri D OH-16
Bobby Bright D AL-2
Ben Chandler D KY-6
Travis Childers D MS-1
Lincoln Davis D TN-4
Artur Davis D AL-7
Chet Edwards D TX-17
Bart Gordon D TN-6
Tim Holden D PA-17
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin D SD-1
Dennis J. Kucinich D OH-10
Larry Kissell D NC-8
Suzanne Kosmas D FL-24
Frank Kratovil Jr. D MD-1
Mike McIntyre D NC-7
Jim Matheson D UT-2
Jim Marshall D GA-8
Charlie Melancon D LA-3
Betsy Markey D CO-4
Eric Massa D NY-29
Michael E. McMahon D NY-13
Walt Minnick D ID-1
Scott Murphy D NY-20
Glenn Nye D VA-2
Collin C. Peterson D MN-7
Mike Ross D AR-4
Ike Skelton D MO-4
John Tanner D TN-8
Gene Taylor D MS-4
Harry Teague D NM-2

My Meditational Exercise Routine

I guess folk who read here would not think my life amounted to much more than a continual siege at the keyboard, generally spewing out thoughts about politics and writing a fictional memoir. As Waylon once said, Wrong.

For the last months I have been dragging my 73-year-old body to physical therapy prescribed by my orthopedist, mainly for a torn rotator cuff. I have to date successfully avoided the prospect of invasive surgery. One operation a decade or less should suffice, I hope. This past year it was removal of my prostate. Good riddance. But another good reason for physical therapy.

My prescribed twelve weeks over, I now make do with an exercise facility in the building where I live. My orthopedist told me to walk for a half an hour a day, and that is what I have been doing. Since it has been a personally enlightening activity and since this is a blog where one expects to be showered with highly personal thoughts, I shall devote the rest of this post to sharing quite precisely my meditational exercise routine.

One of the joys of my life has been to write and to cultivate an appreciation for music. It did not take me long, on the walking device I now use, to begin doing my strides to music in my head. I started with my metered version of the Lord’s Prayer.

I am in my fourth week of this, so I will give you the routine for a twenty minute walk at two miles an hour, no incline. I know that is modest but there are reasons. My goal is a weekly rise in time to a half hour, then a weekly rise in miles per and incline.

So in my head for the first five minutes I cadence the following words, two or three times with breaks after lines and between stanzas. I do this part swinging both arms at my side. This was not easy at first because of balance issues. It is easy enough now.

Abba whose home in heaven is

Hallowed and holy is your name

Let your realm come your will be done

Till earth and heaven are the same


Give us this day our daily bread
Forgive the wrongs that we have done
As we forgive those who do wrong
Lead us not into temptation

Deliver us from evil Lord
And guide us safely to your shore
Yours is the power to heal and mend
Your’s is the glory ever more

Stephen C. Rose – The Lord’s Prayer Song (home demo) ♫ http://blip.fm/~g04vl

The next thing for me is to sing (to myself) “We Are Climbing Jacob’s Ladder” which for me goes way back and way deep for reasons I can and will/do explain here and there. I do it to the following version and the following words.

Bernice Johnson Reagon – We Are Climbing Jacob’s Ladder ♫ http://blip.fm/~f7z6a

I do not follow her words which double each phrase. Here is what I do in my head.

CHORUS:

We are climbing Jacob’s ladder (We are we are climbing climbing Jacob’s ladder, etc)
We are climbing Jacob’s ;adder
We are climbing Jacob’s ladder
Soldiers of the cross

Every rung goes higher higher
Every rung goes higher higher
Every rung goes higher higher
Soldiers of the cross

REPEAT CHORUS

Sinners do you love my Jesus (3x)
Soldiers of the cross

REPEAT CHORUS

If you love him why not serve him (3x)
Soldiers of the cross

REPEAT CHORUS

Rise shine give God glory (3x)
Soldiers of the cross

REPEAT CHORUS

I conclude with my Communion Song. Here is the song:

Bill Horwitz “Communion Song” by Stephen C. Rose from Stranger Named Peace ♫ http://blip.fm/~g05z5

I think the walking can be inferred from listening to both the words and the intervening guitar bridges.

Lord have mercy on me
I’ve sinned most grievously
I am not worthy to eat or drink with thee
Come to my table said he
If heavy-laden you be
Eat of bread and drink of wine with me
He said come all you thirsty
Come all you blind
Come all you hungry
Mercy you’ll find

On the night that he was betrayed
Before the police raid
Rumors of coming coming doom were in the air
In the upper room
Disciples gathering there
Jesus washed from their tired feet the dust of the thoroughfare
He said if you’d follow me
A servant you must be
This is the only
Way to be free

On the night that he was betrayed
Jesus bread did take
Suffering he began to break it
This is my body said he
And broken it shall be
As oft as you shall eat remember me
He said take of this bread
Eat of it too
This is my body
Broken for you

On the night that he was betrayed
Jesus wine did take
Sadly they heard the words he had to say
This is my blood said he
It shall be shed for thee
As oft as you shall drink remember me
He said take of this wine
Drink of it too
This is my blood
Blood shed for you

Well, there is no need to insist on the efficacy of these meditations. But for me they eliminate any sense of dogged time impatience. I usually run over the time. When the time is longer I will add some new pieces that mean something to me. I have one in mind which I will add to this post in time. Needless to say, the most important is probably The Lord’s Prayer for obvious reasons. It really contains everything if I may borrow from Keats the notion of all you need to know on earth. If this prayer became universal — it need hardly be denoted Christian or creedal — there might be at least some reflection before pulling the various triggers of our iffy nature.

Significant Recent Tweets Posted November 6, 2009

The Socialism Meme — How Dumb Are We?

The Socialism Meme — How Dumb Are We?

The dumbest warp in the “conservative” brain is the skewering of anything they do not like about Obama as socialist.

Let me define some terms.

Socialism is state control. It is based on colectivism, Greatest good for greatest number. It opposes individualism and free enterprise. In practice, it can range from Naziism (national socialism) to benign state-run societies that permit a measure of capitalism and individual initiative. Opponents of socialism tend to equate it with big and all-pervasive government.

Capitalism is a process of growth based on the use of money to create more money. It is generally the product of exploiting the weak and poor for the benefit of capitalists who have money to invest and whose goal is to increase their stake.

Democracy is a complex term because it means more than simple majority rule. It carries with it the idea that all people matter and that a government should be of the people instead of merely for the people.

Liberalism is likewise complex. It has become largely understood to mean permissive and inclined to solve everything by helping those who are seen as disadvantaged. In truth liberalism is a viewpoint that embraces the essence of democracy but which also affirms the key role of the individual and of responsibility in the scheme of things.

Conservatism in practice during the past fifty years or so has become so far removed from its roots that we now have a Libertarian category for folk who can no longer accept what conservatism has become. What it has become is the sponsor of an ideology which embraces impunity (the end justifying the means regardless), an implicit form of state control in our massive military-industrial apparatus and the most mean-spirited display of regard for all Americans that can be imagined.

This does not describe all conservatives but it does capture the contradiction between a conservative regard for the individual and limited government and the cherry picking attutude that turned conservatives into the largest creators of government debt in our history, the largest support for ill-founded wars and the group most happy with our tendency to jail anything we don’t like that moves.

This all adds up to the reason why Obama is so popular. Among leaders, he has assiduously tried to avoid labels and reclaim from each of the above what is actually the best meaning of the terms. Instead of socialism, he wants a responsive government that is less military-industrial than it has been. Instead of unbridled capitalism, he wants a measure of profitability and individual initiative to get our economy out of the 20th century and into the 21st.

He believes in the “of the people” side of democracy. And he plucks from the welter of conservative confusion the pristine importance of responsibility and individual initiative.

The source of the visceral hatred of Obama is not his race but his smarts. We are watching the seven deadly sins crop up with regularity from the wingnuts as they reckon with the fox who has eaten their ideological chicken coop dry.

In the context of this discussion, it can be seen that the socialism meme is not about to gain any traction. The fact is that the conservative Francis Fukayama has been more right than wrong in his thinking about where we are. Liberal democracies are the gold standard of governance.

Can we move on to something else and let politics be a debate about real nuts and bolts rather than dumb memes?

What in God’s Name Are We Doing?

Here is the issue in a nutshell though it is just one way of raising the question.

Texas Planned Parent Exec Becomes Right To Life Prayer Vigil Participant

Now my wife and my progressive friends are problem-free with respect to choice and thus can deal with an abortion seen on ultrasound without having a change of heart.

The recondite position of our President will not satisfy the right to lifers. They — correctly in my view — say you are either for us or against us.

Society has intervened in this dispute with Roe v. Wade and various decisions relating to the rough edges of the matter, partial birth and so forth.

My problem is that, like it or not, I am obligated by my calling to see if there is not another way of looking at this whole thing. Clearly the present way can become demeaning to all concerned.

The rabid choice person looks ugly and so does the rabid pro lifer. At the end of the spectrum, on both sides, there is a dance of doom.

If we have to choose between being pro-choice and pro-life, it is either a false choice or an inadequate one.

Here is my list of factors that would need to be considered to discuss this issue satisfactorily:

1. Whether we, me and thee, are in control of things on this planet. My answer is that we are, however you parse it. We were given control. We are the only ones here. And so forth.  What this says to me is that we are under no obligation to some external power or force to decide whether we will pray for life or work for choice. We have the right to believe otherwise, but when push comes to shove, we are the deciders and thus the responsible parties.

2. Whether the issue is not larger than the question of the fate of pregnancies. Why, yes, indeed, say I.  I see, for example, no reason why we should not apply our vaunted scientific wit to the question of how to prevent pregnancies entirely until a process has taken place to determine if one is willing to take on the responsibilities of parenthood. This might extend to a decision to include males among those who bear responsibility for the plethora of “accidental” pregnancies that issue either in more kids or more abortions, depending.

One thought might be to make vasectomies mandatory but easily reversible. And to require kid licenses if we require marriage licenses.

3. Which leads directly to the twofold role of sex in the world. One is clearly derived from mating rituals, but is ever confused with rituals which have to do with conquest, love, rape, caring touching — in short, everything that has to do with the joint use of our bodies, from the most romantic heights to the most dismal and abusive depths.

All this says to me is that the issue is more complex precisely because of the massive weight given to relationship between individuals.

4. Then there is the legitimate question of what constitutes life that should be protected. Quite simply, it can hardly be claimed that one is pro-life in the widest sense if there is a willingness to eat once-living things. Where do we draw a line? We draw it at people, I assume. Thus Jeffrey Dahmer is excoriated while a porcine glutton who likes to consume quail and all manner of pates is not responsible for what life went through to get to his or her plate.

The stock rejoinder to this line of thinking is that we are operating according to instructions attibuted to the deity — finding our authority in some text or other.

5. The problem with such an authority solution is that it is nonsense. We have no recourse but to be humble in the face of the complexities of life, admitting that we cannot summon up any authority beyond that of our own experience.

So let me jump to us.

We are endowed with elements that some have named reason, conscience, the capacity to choose, the need to relate somehow to the society and world around us, etc.

My own decision based on my own experience is that I am a spectrum.   At one end are primal threads that go back to creation, whatever that was, whenever it was. At the other end is the wondrous region of vision and sight and hearing, and the capacity to do what I am doing now — thinking as I type. To contemplate ourselves is about a million times more complex than attempting to list the elements of the computer you are next to.

6. This is why most issues I consider seriously bring me to a halt. Only my experience inclines me. Even that is unreliable and subject to distortion. My sum of experience impelled me to have a welcoming view of the civil rights movement in its many expressions in the 50s and 60s and a welcoming attitude to and respect for the opposite sex and a willingness to concede their arguments for choice, while secretly reserving my right to not go all the way.

In general I will feel OK with this resolution until the pro-life people become more consistent in their views and begin to stand against capital punishment, against war, against the routine torment of  children who came to term to find themselves in horrendous environments. When this begins to happen, I will be forced to harden my approach to those for whom choice represents licence and a thing on which my voice is immaterial because the choice is not mine.

That is, of course, true and it has never (yet) failed to stop my mouth..

Significant Tweets from Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Significant Tweets from Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Follow Me on Twitter

(Important things that warrant more than casual attention)

No Difference Between President Obama and Candidate Obama // http://bit.ly/1mteAR //Plouffe sets Arianna straight

An Open Note To David Plouffe: http://wp.me/pnU5F-1Dh

http://bit.ly/1MbDCO From The Obama Blog VIDEO We Have A Lot of Work To Do

O’Donnell To Steele: “You Led Your Party To A Disastrous Loss… Congratulations” (VIDEO) http://bit.ly/ZQLZR

Read this obit of Qian Xuesen. Cold War =ed FBI and Red Scare Mentality Run Rampant http://bit.ly/30mNQo

Bloomberg shouldn’t be shocked. His campaign was a travesty of misspent money on rotten ads. Poor show all around.

Post Election: Mark has it right at Daily Kos but proposes no solution.http://bit.ly/2ImpoK I do here:  http://bit.ly/19zoUI

Looks like labor pushed Owen over the top in NY 23 http://bit.ly/uNlrn

Hoffman’s Loss Amplified if You Give Owens Dede’s Votes http://bit.ly/hamB6 //wingnut presidential wannabes took a big loss

An Open Note To David Plouffe

REMARKABLE (Update): Evidently criticism of Arianna is not permitted in Huffington Post comments. That is her right. It is her site. You will need to judge whether the statement below is so injurious that it warrants censorship. I posted this there in hopes it would get to the author of the column.

SECOND UPDATE (Wed. Afternoon) David Plouffe on John Stewart — a great appearance BTW — explained exactly what I have not really known. He had some serious need for down time after the election. A new child in particular. He said today that he expects the phone to ring and he will be back in the active Obama camp. That makes Tim Kaine a placeholder IMO. Unless the decision is to make OFA a separate entity and rev it up.  Another example of the virtue of patience and taking the longer view.

Dear David,

Good to see you taking Arianna to task. She has consistently used Obama as a whipping boy to promote a naive notion of liberalism. I applaud the following:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-plouffe/president-obama-and-candi_b_343985.html

But do wish you were more in the fray yourself. I have turned into a broken record on the subject. Obama needs you at the head pf the Democratic Party, remoulding it. With all due respect to the OFA folk who have tried to take up the mantle, the results have been less than good.

The issue is not just organizing. It is strategy and framing the attack on the Republicans. We lucked out in NY 23 yesterday. Anything less would have put egg on our face big time.

Go into the Oval Office.  Say you are ready to take up the cudgel again. Send Tim Kaine to the Peace Corps or some other job for which he is suited. Bring some never-tested RFK-type moxie to the priogressive argument so it will not merely be a karmic dance with the hapless MSM.

In short take up your half of the job that was the campaign.

That is what is missing from your rejoinder to Ms. Huffington.

Significant Tweets for Tuesday November 3, 2009

Follow Me on Twitter

Nebraska Voters Favor Public Option, Want Ben Nelson To Back It Read more at: http://bit.ly/4xFjvP

http://bit.ly/1CbIJ4 Lieberman on board, quoth Reid //how far can you throw Lieberman?

NY Times Tightening Access — All this will do is shift readers to free online sources. Beast posts “direct” links then signup intervenes.

http://bit.ly/1CbIJ4 Brits will cut too big to fail banks dawn to size — chop ‘em up.

Bullets are selling faster than factories can make them, http://bit.ly/1b1w8S

Palin’s undelivered victory and concession speeches whole. (She praises Obama.) http://bit.ly/TbSVp

Prepping for A Democratic Bloodbath: http://wp.me/pnU5F-1D8

Prepping for A Democratic Bloodbath

That is a bitter headline folks.

While all the pundits are jawing about the divisions on the Republican side, I will jaw about the failure of the party I have voted for forever to capitalize on the Obama victory, on his popularity and on the political opportunities that have been given to us over the last months.

Yes I say opportunities because I have learned to immunize myself to the Chris Matthews virus, the Ed Schults bluster and Kieth and Rachel’s intermittent immaturity and sounded a single theme,  in the face of lack of interest and an occasional suggestion that I protest too much.

My point is that this is the time when the Democratic Party could and should have been taking up the cudgels and pushing the Obama agenda, not letting the dumb media write the script. There is only one person that I believe had the moxie to pull this off and he was off writing a book about the campaign. They say that David Plouffe is as powerful as ever. I do not believe it.

The unwritten text of the last months is that Obama was given a golden opportunity to take over and mould the party — essentially transferring the Obama in America brand direct to the DNC. This has NOT happened despite the protests of those who have worked day and night to make it happen. The narrative has been successfully distorted and the reality has begun to reflect it.

Tomorrow I see no consolation emerging. I do not see a Deeds upset. Even if Corzine ekes out a win I do not count that a triumph. And if Hoffman validates the polling I find that NY 23 result a travesty for the Democrats. I see this as a kick in the knee to our party. And I can hear the cartilage tearing. Slush!

Obama is a centrist whose heart is progressive and whose brain is pragmatic. David Plouffe   is an instinctive winning political operative who has the best grasp of how to frame things since the Kennedy’s appeared to be more intelligent than they actually were in practice.

I do not know if there is still time to clean up the mess that we are in.

But I do know what would make it happen. I have said it since before Obama’s smashing and long predicted victory. I was shocked at the decisions made then. Disappointed in the way the transition failed to see the need and address it. And now I am writing the report card.

No Obama bigwigs frequent this blog. If  they did I would likely know it. Sometimes a peripheral person will say right on and confess that they too have no access.

Harold Bloom is the public intellectual who serves as the linchpin for this post. He has militantly insisted that individuals make history.

I share that insistence. The only remedy I see is for the party to do now what it should have done more than a year ago.

« Older entries