Comment On: Matthew Hoh Interviewed By Zakaria: 60,000 Troops In Afghanistan Won’t Defeat Al Qaida (VIDEO)

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Permalink to this comment

How can the President exit Afghanistan and not be seen as caving in on the war on terror?

First, the notion that he will not decide this is wrong. His taking of time has nothing to do with the elections in this country and everything to do with the mode of operation he always follows. He gets done what is possible to do. That is what politics is about. He is a good politician because most often he achieves what he says he wants to achieve.

I think every moment of delay is a victory for those who believe that we need to leave Afghanistan. The question is how. I think this is what he will eventually tell the Ameriican people with a step by step indication of how he intends to proceed.

The elements of such steps might well be 1. A gradual effort to provide support for development in areas where this is feasible; 2. outreach to the elements of the insurgency that are amenable to negotiation; 3. continued direct attacks on the actual centers of terror export ; 4. more and more emphasis on challenging the root political assumptions of religious fundamentalism about total domination of nations and regions; 5. and a frank calculation that our ultimate global interest lies in achieving a real recovery here, a work that has barely begun.

The President has proven a master at achieving wins where they are least expected. Don’t write him off yet.

The ‘aginners’ and the politics of hate

Below is all QUOTE from the Jerusalem Post column The ‘aginners’ and the politics of hate
By DOUGLAS BLOOMFIELD

MY DAD didn’t vote for Barack Obama, thought he was “trying to be Santy Claus to everyone” with his tax dollars. But he had a great deal of respect for the office and the man, and was deeply troubled by the hatred being stirred up in the country.

That doesn’t mean dad was some soft liberal; he was tough, conservative and not always the poster boy for tolerance. He was repulsed by the Christian fundamentalists who dominated the Republican Party, and didn’t care much for the liberals running the Democratic Party. We disagreed on a lot more than we could agree on when it came to politics. We shared a love for Israel, but he was a hard-line Likudnik – although, to my surprise, he made the transition to the middle with his hero, Sharon, and for most of the same reasons. He never had much sympathy for the Palestinians, and he believed that the Arabs would wipe Israel off the map if given half a chance, but felt that it was in Israel’s interest to separate into two states.

He was an avid student and voracious reader of history – particularly Jewish history and the American Civil War. I think his greatest satisfaction – outside his four children, 10 grandchildren and seven great-grandchildren – dated back over 70 years, to his experience as a yeshiva student in Cleveland.

He remembered the Depression not just for the economic hard times, but also for the outbursts of anti-Semitism that characterized much of the 1930s. To him many of the hate radio voices of today were echoes of one from his youth, Father Charles Coughlin, the rabid anti-Semitic radio preacher who praised Hitler and accused FDR of “leaning toward international socialism” (sound familiar?) and being a tool of the Jews.

Dad didn’t listen to talk radio; it just made him angry, he said, and he thought most of those on it were “stupid.” He said people like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh and their ilk reminded him of Father Coughlin. He called them “aginners.” They don’t stand for anything, they just want to tear things and people down and tell you what they’re against, he liked to say.

“They’re aginners, not builders,” he explained. “It’s always easier to be an aginner.”

The aginners don’t have to take any responsibility, they don’t have to solve problems. Actually they prefer to create problems for others, he’d say. Often the aginners are haters, racists, elitists. Or they are stirring up rage for purely mercenary reasons.

NO PARTY has a monopoly on aginners, although the conservatives appear intent on cornering the market these days and have the greatest access to the mass media – despite absurd claims about the “liberal media.” Race baiting is a popular focus for hate-talkers like Beck, who has accused the president of hating white people, and Limbaugh, who is alerting the nation to the looming crisis created by two black teens beating up a white kid on a Missouri school bus.

The Jewish community produced our own contingent of aginners in last year’s campaign, accusing Obama of being a Jew-hating, closet Muslim out to destroy Israel.

When it came to politics, my father and I found little in common, but there was one thing we could agree on – the aginners. Dad would have agreed with The New York Times’s resident conservative columnist David Brooks, who said Beck and Limbaugh, with their agenda of fear and hate instead of ideas and policy, aren’t going to take over the country, but they are taking over the Republican Party, and that’s not good for the country.

True understanding would strip us of our religious pretensions

http://ow.ly/lkZX Israel Has No Right To Act With Impunity

FROM THE FULL BLOG

Today’s climate has become demonic. And the culprit at the root is religion, or so I contend. A true understanding of who we are would strip us of our religious pretensions and acknowledge that we possess inherently a dignity that even our own sin cannot entirely eradicate.

Significant Recent Tweets July 4, 2009

#
The Anti-LGBT Moments of the Sarah Palin Tornado http://bit.ly/DozI0

#
Interactive Map of Debate on Future of Newspapers http://bit.ly/14e1bq

#
Is Iran Coercing Reformer Confessions? http://bit.ly/18jfwU

#
Palin and The Power of Resentment http://bit.ly/JIOiw

#
http://bit.ly/26bL0 LGBT: Judge Walker Fast-Tracks Olson/Boies

#
Pre-Pre-Pre Pubescent Love, Adam Faced Down By Conspicuous Wealth, One Less Student http://bit.ly/y30SU

#
Lincoln and the Hanging of 38 Sioux, 1862 http://bit.ly/4RwVL

#
Tuesday MJ Memorial Will Test Web Infrastructure http://bit.ly/I6V2s

#
Carolyn Maloney for U.S. Senate http://bit.ly/hck6x

#
A Good Argument for Insurance: Illegal Surgery in Las Vegas http://bit.ly/3WImsm

#
Six Reasons Why Iran Cannot Be Explained in a Twitter Feed http://bit.ly/3seVGy

#
The Coming Chinese Superstate: Richard Lynn’s Eugenics http://bit.ly/1O7iMO

#
Blog: A List of Senators and Congress Members and Their Receipts from Health Care Interests http://bit.ly/rHtnn

#
HT Obama Blog: POLITICO has become a political gossip website. (It was never that great to begin with.) http://bit.ly/17B3EF

#
Carolyn Maloney for U.S. Senate http://bit.ly/hck6x

#
Thoughts on The Future of Journalism from the Purple List http://bit.ly/9gsC5

#
Pakistan’s top Taliban leader, Baitullah Mehsud, is buying children as young as 7 to serve as suicide bombers. http://bit.ly/GvzBV

#
Social media schizophrenia …. are you suffering from this ? http://bit.ly/SwLHR

#
First DNC Story Ad on Health Care Video and A Chance to Contribute to Airing It http://bit.ly/n7Rbr

#
CC Usury with Impunity Hiking Rates Before Law Takes Effect in February http://bit.ly/N0HLP

Palin and the Power of Resentment

Palin and The Power of Resentment

Resentment of the oppressed — minority, gay, refugee — is expected. Those with less visible cause for resentment need a bearer of angst, a purveyor of pay-back, a person who can encode and manifest the resentment vibe. Words matter less than the body lingo.

If Palin has any future power it is as the bearer of resentment. An urge for comeuppance empowers fundamentalism which is why resentment looks similar regardless of where it crops up. It wills dominance over a world become strange and alien. It condenses things into manageable binary yeses and noes. It is banal. It has aspects of evil.

People who are for Palin are harbingers of resentment. Palin coalesces a constellation of hurts, whether marginalization, moral horror, or fear of the unknown, or anger at one’s fate.

At one end of this spectrum are those who voiced kill sentiments at her rallies. At the other those who take umbrage at barbs from the left that they deem unfair.

Palin broadcast her intent quite clearly yesterday. She intends to play the resentment card across the length and breadth of the United States. And every snicker from the left will be fuel to the fire she attempts to ignite. Truth has no necessary advantage in any attempt to oppose her.

And our MSM can be trusted to give credibility to her run.

This is as potentially serious as Richard Nixon entering a New York law firm without any seeming grasp of power and emerging with the nomination in a few years and the Presidency in a few months. The second time around of anything obviates the need for gravitas. Nixon had it. Palin does not. It does not matter.

This will play out and she will probably go down. But not if she is not taken seriously and measured by the force that gives her the power to make her move in the first place.

Read about ressentement (resentment) and rationality here.

« Older entries