Can I assume that everyone agrees? Doubtful. Certainly the contention that
there are universal values is noit settled. Likewise is there is a such a
thing as conscious (intentional) thought? And is there an inherent value in
thinking threes? What is a reasonable root triad for such? Lots of
questions including the direction implied in the remarks on pragmaticism.
As indicated Triadic Philosophy is hardly developed theoretically, though I
am working on it. I have tended to validate its premises on the basis of
experience somewhat in the matter I infer from reading the NA many times.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Stephen C. Rose <stever...@gmail.com>
> Thanks to Gary R for noting Triadic Philosophy. Insofar as it is a theory
> it is nascent. As a method of conscious thinking in line with Peirce's NA
> it is more developed. I have written some short books on the subject and
> all are available on Kindle. For this thread I will simply post excerpts
> with a reference to the book from which they are drawn.
> From Triadic Philosophy - 100 Aphorisms Introduction
> Triadic Philosophy is based on what is already within every person on the
> planet. Conscience. A sense of right and wrong. And knowledge of values
> that stand above all others.
> Triadic Philosophy uses aphorisms and maxims to generate conduct.
> Triadic Philosophy relies on its own adaptation of the pragmatic maxim
> developed by Charles Sanders Peirce in the 19th century. The pragmatic
> maxim stated: "Consider what effects, that might conceivably have practical
> bearings, we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then, our
> conception of these effects is the whole of our conception of the object."
> Triadic Philosophy is not concerned with narrowing our conception and
> limiting it to the result. It is concerned with arriving at specific acts
> and expressions which are intrinsically ameliorative, that make life
> better, less harmful, more true, more beautiful.
> Triadic Philosophy honors Peirce by claiming that it is a tiny offshoot of
> what he came to mean by the term pragmaticism. This term was his evolution
> of pragmatism. Pragmaticism is a bastion against the dominant notion that
> we are all reality is. We are not all of reality. Our individual
> perceptions are not all reality. Before we are, reality is. After we are,
> reality remains. Pragmaticism opens the door to a metaphysics based
> precisely on the premise that by our fruits we shall be known. It is a now
> metaphysics. It proves out. It is not supposition.
> We are inevitably social. We are capable of achieving a sense of
> universality. This universal sense distinguishes Triadic Philosophy.
> Triadic Philosophy seeks a world based on universal acceptance of
> universal values. The battle to overcome harm, bullying and war is
> dependent on a move to nonviolent understandings. This is the signature
> achievement underlying Triadic Philosophy.
> From the Introduction to Triadic Philosophy 100 Aphorisms Kindle Store
> *@stephencrose <https://twitter.com/stephencrose>*
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at