Neither this approach nor the celebration-approach it criticizes is on the mark.
1. Summary judgments before the process is complete.
2. Health care reform IS a continuing legislative process.
3. Instant historical judgments do not stand the test of time. No one knows whether history will judge this process as a victory for the people or for the special interests. Likely both. Likely historians will disagree.
A better approach is — What can those who would like an improved bill do now? I take it this is why the White House is encouraging some additions as the final version gets hammered out.
Who knows what the coming days will bring?
Nightmare? All this would mean is that the House Bill dominates the final run and is passed by a simple majority in the Senate minus the Stupak Amendment. This is still a tempest in a teapot. Breathe and you get a headline.
Kennedy’s Closest Confidante, in Politics and Life http://ow.ly/nkeT (This profile is excellent and opens a window to a temp. appt.)
As the excellent NYTimes profile notes (at the link above), Vicky Reggie Kennedy is a progressive soldier. I cannot believe she will not be offered and take the interim appointment that will enable her to cast the votes Teddy would have cast before a special election — months away — fills the post for the remainder of Teddy’s term.
Here is my original post on this:
Looks Like Teddy Replacement Wlll Get Done ASAP (As he wished) http://ow.ly/lx24
Unless hell and high water are ranged against Deval Patrick and the Massachusetts Legislature, there will be a replacement for Teddy Kennedy on the Senate floor when the key votes on health care — Teddy’s signature issue — are taken.
Since the drill involves a person who would not likely be a future candidate for the Kennedy seat, which would be decided in a forthcoming special election, there is some chance that the appointment will have deep symbolic significance. No name comes immediately to mind, although it is possible that Vicky Kennedy, the Senator’s popular widow, might fill the bill.
I imagine the Legislature will act post haste to rescind a law that was passed to prevent Mitt Romney from appointing a Republican successor in the event that Kerry was elected President — which, as we now know, was more than likely had Bush and Company not used terror as a scare tactic weeks before the contest was decided.
A List of Senators and Congress Members and Their Receipts from Health Care Interests
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ): $7,504,867
Sen. John Kerry (D-MA): $7,341,399
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA): $2,149,503
Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT): $1,795,949
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY): $1,743,835
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT): $1,685,890
Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC): $1,350,454
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX): $1,346,574
Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ): $1,321,457
Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA): $1,160,826
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH): $1,081,378
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC): $ 999,611
Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN): $ 994,699
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT): $ 980,417
Sen. Thomas Harkin (D-IA): $ 935,711
Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA): $ 919,793
Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR): $ 896,067
Sen. Debbie Ann Stabenow (D-MI): $ 827,294
Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-MD): $ 797,185
Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT): $ 788,650
Rep. Tom Price (R-GA, 6th): $2,090,127
Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ, 6th): $1,627,024
Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX, 6th): $1,518,285
Rep. John Gingrey (R-GA, 11th): $1,392,343
Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY, 15th): $1,304,569
Rep. John Dingell (D-MI, 15th): $1,148,060
Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA, 7th): $1,136,519
Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO, 7th): $1,102,468
Rep. Charles Boustany (R-LA, 7th): $1,058,786
Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA, 9th): $1,046,519
I would like to see this list enlarged if anyone has sourced information. The second link above is to a piece in the Huffington Post which is trying to create some standards for claiming that they are operating on a competent journalistic basis.
I see lots of bile being spread around about President Obama’s efforts to get a green economy bill through. Congress has passed a green bill. It’s the Senate’s turn.
Today I want to flag a statement by the President that I saw on TV so I do not have the exact language.
In essence he said, A green economy will put us in the lead in the 21st century and failure will leave us a declining nation.
This was the argument of this site before I went whole hog for Obama in Iowa. It is absolutely true.
Our recession has everything to do with the need to shift gears to green. Not just laws. Lifestyle. Spending less for junk and more for quality.We are being forced to build a new and more sustainable world.
There are prophets of this movement and I do not mean the obvious environmentalists. I mean writers like Robert Pirsig who elevated the word quality into the lexicon of politics and thinkers like Thorstein Veblen who dissected the consumer society before it became an obnoxious stain on the surface of the globe.
President Obama is faced now with a huge choice. But happily it has already been made. He cares enough about his commitment to green and its value to the country to go with Democrats alone if he would otherwise have to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
David Brooks says the energy bill in the House version is a quilt of special interest concessions rather than a clean executive procedural bill.
I am sure the President wants the strongest of bills and if he has to muscle Republicans and Blue Dogs to get it, he will. And if, God forbid, these retrograde folk should succeed in watering down green, we will go at it incrementally with replacements at the polls for the Senators and Representatives who did not cotton to the Obama agenda.
The energy bill is important but similar things could be said about health care. Watch for a July 4 peaking of the Obama counterpunch on this issue. The President is just as adept at being President as he was at being a candidate. And the MO has not changed. Nor for that matter has media obtuseness in failing to recognize it.
Things I have thoughts on but refuse to blog about:
Sarah Palin and Family